Heard all the fuss about Vanity Fair and Miley Cyrus? Evidently the magazine’s topless (though covered) portrait of the star of the Hannah Montana franchise suddenly doesn’t sound like such a great idea to both the star and the folks at Disney who care about keeping Hannah the sweet teen she is marketed to be. And I’m sure that being on set with photographer Annie Liebovitz is intimidating to stars way older than Miley Cyrus. Aside from the fact that she’s nearly unrecognizable in this picture, what do you think? Is this portrait really a bad idea … are the tweens who love Hannah going to be led astray by a Vanity Fair story/portrait? I think the Chicago Sun-Times headline is right — is this really a scandal?
Responses to “Hannah Montana, by Annie Liebovitz.”
April 29th, 2008 at 9:46 am
I don’t have a problem with that one as much as the one of her lying across her dad. That one is the creepier.
April 29th, 2008 at 2:06 pm
I completely agree with Susan. The photograph of Miley draped across her father with an exposed midriff is certainly not wholesome.
April 30th, 2008 at 9:19 am
I agree with Susan and Elizabeth that the photo of Miley with her father is worse than the cover shot. It made me so sad to see him being sucked into the shoot as a participant rather than being the adult and protector she needs him to be. It’s not her image (or Disney’s success) that’s at stake here…. it’s the soul of a precious, beautiful young girl.
May 1st, 2008 at 8:38 am
I really don’t see what the big deal is of her back showing. I bet there’s a whole lot more skin showing when she wears a bathing suit. I agree abou the picture of her and father. they look more like lovers than father and daughter. That kind of creeps me out.
April 29th, 2008 at 9:14 am
That photo makes me think of ‘Pretty Baby’